Skip to content
BBloggersideas
Make logo
Automation & Workflow

Make

Visual automation for complex workflows

4.5 editor scoreNo user reviews yet
From $9/moFree planCloud / SaaS · APISince 2012

Editor score

Hands-on tested against our published criteria

No user reviews yet

Visit MakeWrite a review

From $9/mo · free plan available

Our verdict

Make is the better automation engine for anything non-trivial, and it asks you to think like a developer without writing code.

Where it wins. The visual canvas makes complex logic comprehensible: branches, error handlers, iterators, and aggregators are all visible in one view, and you can inspect the exact data passing between modules. Pricing per operation is materially cheaper than per-task billing at volume. Built-in data transformation, HTTP modules, and JSON handling mean you can integrate an API that has no official connector, which effectively removes the catalogue limit.

Where it falls short. The learning curve is real — data structures, mapping, and error routing take time, and someone who found Zapier easy will find Make intimidating for a week. The integration catalogue, while large, is smaller than Zapier's for niche apps. Operations still meter every module run, so an aggressive polling scenario burns allowance. Documentation assumes more technical fluency than it should.

Our call. The best value for anyone building real workflows. Choose Zapier if simplicity matters more than capability, n8n if you want to self-host.

Best for

Operations and technical marketers building multi-branch workflows who want capability and lower cost per run.

Key takeaways

  • 1Visual canvas makes branching logic comprehensible
  • 2Iterators, aggregators, and error handlers built in
  • 3Per-operation pricing beats per-task at volume
  • 4HTTP and JSON modules integrate APIs with no connector
  • 5Genuine learning curve — a week before fluency
  • 6Smaller catalogue than Zapier for niche apps

Make gives you a canvas instead of a list, and that difference matters once a workflow branches. You can see the whole scenario at once, route data down parallel paths, loop over arrays, and aggregate results — things that are painful or impossible in a linear builder — and it costs less per run than [Zapier](/tool/zapier).

What we like

  • Excellent for complex workflows
  • Clear visual debugging
  • Strong value per operation
  • Handles any API via HTTP

Worth noting

  • Steeper to learn
  • Fewer niche integrations
  • Operations meter every module
  • Documentation assumes fluency

Plans

Pricing

Free

Free
  • 1,000 operations per month
  • Unlimited active scenarios
  • Visual workflow canvas
  • No-code HTTP and JSON modules
  • 15-minute minimum interval
Most popular

Core

$9 /mo

per month, 10k operations

  • 10,000 operations per month
  • 1-minute scheduling interval
  • Unlimited active scenarios
  • Access to premium apps
  • Custom variables

Pricing verified Aug 14, 2026. Prices shown are billed annually where available and may change — always confirm on the vendor site.

From real users

Reviews

Write a review

No verified reviews yet

We publish a user score only once real, verified reviews exist — so this tool is rated on our hands-on testing alone for now. Used it? Your review would be the first.

Write the first review

Good to know

Frequently asked questions

Is Make hard to learn?

Harder than Zapier, yes. You work with data structures, mapping, and error routing, and the documentation assumes some technical fluency. Expect about a week before you are comfortable.

How is Make cheaper than Zapier?

Zapier bills per task, where every step counts. Make bills per operation with far more included at each price point, so complex multi-step workflows cost dramatically less to run.

Can Make connect to an app it does not support?

Yes, via its HTTP and JSON modules you can call any REST API directly. That effectively removes the integration catalogue as a limit if you can read API docs.

Make

From $9/mo

Visit site